E. M. Forster's A Room With A View Analysis
At the beginning of the
movie, when the viewer gets the first glimpse of the characters staying in the
guesthouse at Florence, he/she may think that all of the characters belong to
the same social class. Some facts that support that thinking would be that they
dress and look pretty much the same and that they get along nicely, which, as
one thinks, would not happen if they were from different social classes. What
the viewer does not know is that his/her mind is about to change.
As we get deeper into the
story, we can see that Lucy Honeychurch, our protagonist, belongs to an upper
middle class, while her cousin Charlotte, who acts as her chaperone, belongs to
the servant class. We are also introduced to the Emersons, who are a little
more difficult to classify, since we know that they live well, maybe not as
well as Lucy, but they certainly do not belong to the lower classes, which
would be the servants and the laborers. Personally, I would classify them in
the intellectual thinkers class because throughout the movie, we can learn the
Mr. Emerson knows a lot of history and is quite liberal, which makes us think
that he is probably an intellectual. Another character that truly calls the
attention of the viewers would be Miss Lavish, who can be described as an eccentric
writer that probably belongs to the intellectuals’ class also, and who thinks
she knows the “true Italy”. This thought is the one that introduced us to the
lower classes in the first place. One day Miss Lavish takes Lucy to what she
claims to be the “real Italy” which ends up being in the poorer place of the
city, where we can see some of the lifestyle of the lower classes.
Now dear reader, you are
probably asking yourself: what about the upper class? Well, let me introduce
you now to one of my favorite characters of the story. His name is Cecil Vyse
and he is, at least for me, a very awkward character. Clearly, he belongs to
the aristocracy. We can see that in the way he behaves around the people of
Lucy’s town and how he often refers to people as if they were below him. The
reason I like Cecil is because I find him a very funny being. The fact that he
practically lives in a crystal bubble with a perfect world amuses me, and even
though he can be seen as arrogant he is a character I cannot stay mad at, I do
not know why.
Since you are probably
bored by now with all of my talk about Cecil Vyse, the only thing left to say
is that, as said in the beginning, social classes can look alike sometimes but
it is the little things, even the way of thinking or behaving that help us tell
one class from another and that, in my opinion, the whole idea of defining a
person by their possessions is as dumb as saying one M&M is better than
another one just because of the color.
I like how you explain that social classes are not always easy to visualize, and that sometimes you may see someone who doesn't look as fancy as someone else, but the fancy one belongs to a lower social class than the one who seems normal.
ReplyDeleteSocial classes are a way to divide the society, but it does not make you as a person. Someone in a lower social class can have higher moral and values than someone whos higher, and vice versa.
ReplyDeleteHello Crystal! I found your analogy of how one M&M is not better than another just because of its color very fitting towards what we as a people judge with the concept of social classes... and I'm referring to both sides of the coin, upper class to lower and vice versa.
ReplyDelete~~~Paula
No no no no no, there a chocolate only M&M's aqnd there are peanut filled ones
ReplyDeleteI liked your final thought about M&Ms and social class. Although you prove a good point, couldn’t you say that defining a person by their possessions is not dumb; I think you mean that judging a person’s personality, or attitude, can’t be done by simple possessions.
ReplyDelete